Tag: manipulatives

  • Union, Intersection and the Empty Set

    Union, Intersection and the Empty Set

    The union is on the left and the intersection is on the right.

    I discussed empty sets in a previous article. I hadn’t yet listened to the recent podcast of The Math Dude, Jason Marshall, in which he introduced sets and subsets. Such a curious coincidence; I thought I would continue down our united path.

    This week, the sweet Math Dude talked about union and intersection of sets. So I’m heading there too – and incorporating the empty set.

    Union and intersection have symbols.

    These symbols represent “operations” (like addition or multiplication) that you do to a pair of sets. They are called the cup and cap and look like, well, a cup and a cap. Or a U and an upside down U. The Union is the U and the intersection is the other one – that’s how I remember it and teach it.

    For the sake of illustration, I’ll use Daughter’s handy SnackTraps like in the picture above.

    The union is everything.

    The sets I’m using are

    L ={green cube, blue half circle thingie}

    R = {green cube, red triangular prism, orange rectangular prism}

    I’m using the letters L and R for left and right in the picture.

    The union of the two sets results in all the pieces from each set, all crammed together. (And if there is a repeated item, you only take it once.)

    The union of the two sets is everything combined (without duplicates).

    Let’s take the set of all states that border Texas and the set of all states that border Oklahoma, like this:

    T = {Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico}

    O = {Arkansas, Colorado, Kansas, Missouri, New Mexico, Texas}

    Then the union of the two would be “The set of all states that border both Texas or Oklahoma or both” and would be T U O = {Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Colorado, Kansas, Missouri, Texas}

    Notice we don’t keep duplicates.

    The intersection is only the common stuff.

    Using the same L and R sets from above, I can take the intersection.

    The intersection is only the stuff they have in common (we get rid of the duplicates here, too).

    Let’s go back to our set of all states that border Texas and Oklahoma:

    T = {Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico}

    O = {Arkansas, Colorado, Kansas, Missouri, New Mexico, Texas}

    Then the intersection of the two would be “The set of all states that border both Texas and Oklahoma, at the same time” and would be T ∩ O = {Arkansas, New Mexico}.

    What happens with the empty set?

    When you start throwing the empty set into the mix, you follow the same rules.

    For the union, you throw everything in both sets into one bag. Well, since there’s nothing in the empty set, “everything” is the original other set!

    The union of the empty set with anything… is that same set back!

    For the intersection, you take only the stuff that’s in common between the two. Since the empty set has nothing – there’s nothing in common.

    The intersection of the empty set with any other set it just the empty set – there’s nothing in common at all!

    Think about it…

    Does this remind you of anything? What similarities do you see between this and addition or multiplication (or subtraction or division)? Ask your children these questions too.

    Get out some snack traps and blocks (or a map) and go for it! Let me know how it goes in the comments.

    Related articles
  • Empty Sets – When to Use Curly Brackets

    Empty Sets – When to Use Curly Brackets

    Are you teaching sets? Some of the stuff that you talk about in set theory  is pretty clear – you have a basket { } and you put stuff in it {♥, ✂, ☎, ✿}. No problem.

    But what’s the deal with the basket with no stuff in it?

    That’s the empty set. It’s written like Ø or simply as the “basket” like this: { }.

    But kids might be tempted to write {Ø} – and then they get it wrong. BUT WHY?

    The empty set is an object!

    Suppose you have four empty sets. Do you have nothing? Nope – you have four containers. Just check your cabinets – I’m guessing you have a handful of empty sets in there with the Rubbermaid® or Tupperware® logo on them.

    And {Ø} is an object inside a set.

    Supposed you put one inside the other, like this:

    This is the same as {Ø}. Would you be willing to put leftovers inside the bigger one while the smaller one is there? It would be something like this:

    Instead, wouldn’t you be more likely to remove one empty set from the other and have just Ø and Ø (no curly brackets) like this:

    What do you think? Does this help you understand the empty set? Will it help you teach it?

    Related articles
  • How to Teach Math Concepts at the Dinner Table

    How to Teach Math Concepts at the Dinner Table

    Would you like to teach math everywhere you go? Well, here’s one from the table!

    Daughter enjoys playing with our salt-and-pepper shaker holder at dinner. She takes out the salt, then takes out the pepper, then replaces the salt, then replaces the pepper.

    The order in which she does these four operations vary. Including switching the salt and pepper.

    She’s slowly putting together the pieces that will one day become the commutative property.

    She’s also practicing substitution…

    She’s learning that the salt and pepper can be switched (commutative). And she’s learning that one can be interchanged for the other (substitution).

    …and the associative property!

    She attempted to put her small milk cup into the holder. It fit, but only with pushing. She then removed the milk cup and attempted to put it in the other side. (At her age the things grown-ups understand are not obvious to her.)

    Although non-equality isn’t part of the associative property (which is if a=b, b=c then a=c), the comparison of three things is.

    Here are the things she’s learning from this dinner session:

    This fact she discovers from interchanging them in the holder.
    By putting them in the holder in a different order, she learns that the equality is commutative.
    Since the milk cup won’t fit into the spot the salt was just in, she learns this.
    And trying to shove the milk cup in the other side yields this fact.

    So pull out the stops – give the children everything. And let them explore. If they have the gift of language, you can hint at some of these properties, but be careful not to go into a full “lesson” at dinner. Teaching math at the dinner table should be fun.

    Where have you seen math properties in your world? Share your stories in the comments – or link back to your story on your blog!

    Related articles
  • Counting Isn’t an Inherent Concept

    Counting Isn’t an Inherent Concept

    We spent our vacation a couple of weeks ago in central Texas. We had lots of fun – including lots of counting.

    One to one association of fingers to Discovery Toys’s Giant Pegboard pegs

    I noticed that some of the basic counting principles grownups know, aren’t inherently known to kids.

    I was observing Daughter as I was counting. She continued to look in deep concentration as I counted from one direction and then recounted from the other. Then I would rearrange the items and count them again. She was still enthralled.

    We teach our young children to count to 10, but never realize they don’t know what that means.

    Counting is a way to associate how much with a group of objects.

    If there are three things in a bundle, we associate the word “three” and the symbol 3 with that bundle. This number is called the cardinality of the set/bundle and means the number of things in it.

    My lone Calculus classmate in high school decided to create her own number system when we were freshmen. Everyone else laughed at her, but I got it. She was noticing that there was no rhyme or reason that we called a set of two objects “two.”

    We’ve decided to say out loud “two” and label it two and 2 and that means this many things: X X

    Counting is a way to order things.

    A bunch of things can be lined up and counted – even if they aren’t technically in a line. Each subsequent number is associated with another object. These numbers are the ordinal numbers. The final number that you count ends up being the cardinality of the set (from above). In this way you use ordinals to determine the cardinality.

    Counting is a way to compare one group of objects with another.

    Take two groups of objects. Pair one object from one group to an object from the other group – set them up in a one-to-one fashion. This shows that the two groups have the same number of objects. It doesn’t determine how many there are, but very young children don’t have to know the numbers to grasp the concept of “the same.”

    This eventually leads to the concepts of equality as well as less than and greater than.

    Counting isn’t dependent on which object you start with.

    This was the craziest concept for me. I noticed this when reading Brown Bear, Brown Bear one night.

    To mix it up (to keep my sanity) I would count the children in the book in differnet directions. After 3,000 nights of reading the same book over and over, something occurred to me. There is no reason for a 2 year old to know that counting in one direction will yeild the same number as counting in another direction.

    This is taught – not directly, but through experience. After counting a bazillion times, we eventually figure out that no matter which way you count things, you’ll get the same number.

    Well, unless Little Brother starts eating those things.

    Counting can be stopped and picked up where you left off.

    This is another concept that grownups “just know.” If you can mark your place (and Little Brother isn’t involved), stopping and coming back won’t change the result. This is the forerunner to addition, too.

    Counting is the foundation of all mathematics.

    This is the kicker. Counting is the beginning of it all.

    If you can get your kiddo to count, the rest is cake. And not just saying, “1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10,” but really getting him or her to understand the totality of the concepts.

    • How much is there?
    • Is there an order?
    • Does one group have more, less or the same as another group?
    • Did the number of objects change when you counted differently?

    Grownups get it, but we aren’t born with it. Imagine that you don’t know these things inherently. How does that change the way you observe the world?

    This article was originally shared on Homeschool Creations.

    Related articles
  • Teaching Subtraction Using a Balance

    Teaching Subtraction Using a Balance

    I love finding nifty ways to use tools for teaching math. Especially tools that aren’t supposed to teach math. Or at least the math I’m trying to get it to teach.

    I have this very cool balance that I got from Discovery Toys that would normally be a science toy. But, alas, I’m a mathematician, Jim, not a doctor. So I’ve taken the fancy science toy and turned it into a way to teach subtraction.

    You can, of course, use it to teach addition and later I’ll do a post on using it to teach multiplication and division.

    If you have children who struggle with math concepts, teaching them with hands on bits (manipulatives) sometimes helps. Here’s how to teach subtraction using a balance:

    This nifty trick can be done with any balance as long as you have weights appropriately sized. Sometimes that’s not so easy to find. Order a colorful balance that’s similar to the Discovery Toys one in video here.

    Did it work? How did your children receive this method of learning arithmetic? Please share your experience with it in the comments!

  • Counting with Ordinal Numbers

    Counting with Ordinal Numbers

    In the last post I discussed cardinal and ordinal numbers. I gave definitions but not much in the way of examples.

    Here’s an example of using ordinal numbers to count up to arrive at the final cardinal number. Oh – and I’m using the fun little critters from Discovery Toys!

    Whatcha think? Does it make you want to count some bugs?

    What other ways can you use to teach counting?

  • How to Train the Brain to Understand the Transitive Property

    How to Train the Brain to Understand the Transitive Property

    Remember the ol’ “if A equals B and B equals C, then A equals C” deal? At parties it’s a great line to drop. In math, it’s officially called … cue music…

    The Transitive Property

    Saying it is fun, teaching it is curious, learning it can be weird.

    Grownups think it’s intuitive. But to a kid, it isn’t. It takes experience and experimentation to learn all the bits that we think are “common sense.”

    The transitive property is really thinking things through. Starting from one place and moving along through another and then arriving at a third place.

    There are many ways to help kids with this learning. Word problems simulate thinking stepping stones. But they can be rather stressful. If you do it through play, you reduce the stress that they face and give them skills they need to tackle advanced thinking, forever.

    This video shows a nifty “toy” from Discovery Toys that can get kiddos using those brain stepping stones.

    Notice the flow is

    1. Choose the number tile with the question number.
    2. Read and answer the question.
    3. Correspond the answer to the letter in the answer box.
    4. Put the number tile with the question number in the corresponding letter box.

    Thinking through from question number to answer letter while avoiding the pitfalls is the challenge.

    Have you played with these? How do you train your kids’ brains for the transitive property?

  • Two Reasons to Memorize Math Facts

    Two Reasons to Memorize Math Facts

    I learned my math facts by “singing” them while looking at flashcards.

    Having these facts ingrained with chanting or singing isn’t a bad idea. It might not “feel right” because we’re so into experiential learning these days. But if a kid can’t immediately access and use things like 8 x 7 = 56, he’s going to be slower than if he can.

    And if he’s slower, he might get frustrated and start to think that he’s not good at math.

    Also, knowing these cheap and dirty math facts helps with confidence. Even if a kid’s struggling with other things in math, knowing that he has this one thing (the “facts”) will help out.

    I fight this battle often. Some people feel that math facts shouldn’t be memorized. But there’s so much value in it.

    How about you? Which side of the fence are you on?

  • How to Teach Division in the Sandbox

    How to Teach Division in the Sandbox

    Need to offer a better way to understand the concept of division and remainders? Try it in the sandbox!

    The Discovery Toys  are proportional, so they allow a really engaging way to see how division and remainders work.

    This video shows how you can help kids put together the numbers 9, 4 and 1 to “see” division at work:

    You can also do this in the bathtub or pool. And the are perfectly weighted and “massed” so they float.

    I think this has something to do with “water displacement,” but I’m not sure. I’m a mathematician, not a physicist. 🙂

  • Using Toys as Curriculum Tools to Teach Arithmetic

    Using Toys as Curriculum Tools to Teach Arithmetic

    Want to give your kiddos a jump start on multiplication and division? What to help the ones struggling with division to grasp it better?

    The Discovery Toys Measure Up Cups can do just that. They are built as a curriculum tool, in the proper ratios, so that the #6 cup holds exactly twice as much as the #3 cup. This allows for engaging and beneficial play that gives kids a grasp on how numbers relate to reality.

    For example, in this video, kids can compare the numbers 3, 6 and 9 to see how they relate:

    You don’t have to say out loud, “three plus 6 is 9” or, “9 divided by 6 is one with three left over.” But these concepts are ingrained into the child’s brain as they see this work.

    What do you think?