1111111111 Comments on: Everybody’s Good at Math http://mathfour.com/general/everybodys-good-at-math "New Math" Homework Support for Gen X Parents Sat, 21 Jan 2012 10:17:41 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9 By: Bon http://mathfour.com/general/everybodys-good-at-math#comment-3091 Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:12:34 +0000 http://mathfour.com/?p=3787#comment-3091 In reply to Lina.

I am involved in my local AAUW study group of their research called, “Why so Few?” I look forward to learning more about the research, so I can be of more help in this conversation. My thoughts all come from my experiences and I’m really looking forward to discovering the research and modifying my thoughts accordingly.

Thank you so much, Lina!

]]>
By: Bon http://mathfour.com/general/everybodys-good-at-math#comment-3090 Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:10:42 +0000 http://mathfour.com/?p=3787#comment-3090 In reply to Cindy.

How wonderful! Thanks so much, Cindy. I appreciate the kind words and the vote of confidence, in addition to the nomination.

]]>
By: Bon http://mathfour.com/general/everybodys-good-at-math#comment-3088 Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:09:24 +0000 http://mathfour.com/?p=3787#comment-3088 In reply to Christine Guest.

Bummer, Christine. It’s uploaded to YouTube, so it shouldn’t be a problem anywhere. I’m not sure how to advise you.

]]>
By: Christine Guest http://mathfour.com/general/everybodys-good-at-math#comment-2636 Mon, 03 Oct 2011 19:27:44 +0000 http://mathfour.com/?p=3787#comment-2636 I’m able to hear the audio, but the text isn’t syncing. I’m using Mozilla on Ubuntu.

]]>
By: Lina http://mathfour.com/general/everybodys-good-at-math#comment-2624 Sun, 02 Oct 2011 17:49:51 +0000 http://mathfour.com/?p=3787#comment-2624 In reply to William.

Thank you. I agree with all your points. I hope you have read my explanation of #girlsaregoodatmath2. It is on my blog at linasouid.wordpress.com.

As an engineer and math teacher I plan to promote positive role models in the campaign. I discussed on the blog that I would like to show female students that they can be feminine and enjoy/excel at math. I think female students feel like they need to choose one over the other.

The reason why there is a ‘2’ is because I do not intend all girls to run towards math, science and engineering. I want to acknowledge that they may be good at other things as well. It can also be read that ‘you may think boys are good at math, but girls are good at math too’.

All in all, I am fighting against the automatic response, ‘I can’t do math’ or ‘I don’t like math’. I hear these statements a lot from female students in class, before they even try! I believe this is coming from the stereotypes in the culture right now. I am trying to counterbalance the stereotype by having great math, science, engineering professionals use the hashtag #girlsaregoodatmath2.

Show your support! Continue the discussion.

]]>
By: Cindy http://mathfour.com/general/everybodys-good-at-math#comment-2623 Sun, 02 Oct 2011 17:12:33 +0000 http://mathfour.com/?p=3787#comment-2623 Good morning and Happy October!

I’ve nominated you/your blog for The Versatile Blogger Award! 🙂 Share seven things about yourself and pass the award along to the most versatile blogs you follow. Follow the link below for details.

Thanks for blogging!! Your blog makes me a better teacher and learner!

Cindy
love2learn2day
http://love2learn2day.blogspot.com/2011/10/versatile-blogger-award.html

]]>
By: William http://mathfour.com/general/everybodys-good-at-math#comment-2610 Sat, 01 Oct 2011 02:51:22 +0000 http://mathfour.com/?p=3787#comment-2610 In reply to Lina.

From the perspective of psychology:

Observations:
1) Untrue or not, you have to include a stereotype in order to claim that it isn’t true. (e.g. I wish people would stop saying “Girls aren’t good at math.”) Just being exposed to a statement gets people thinking that it may have some validity.
2) When we offer a general inclusionary statement, the purpose or message may not be understood (e.g. “Everyone is good at math.” having the purpose of including females in the group of folks who are good at math.) It’s like saying “All containers hold liquid” when you are trying to promote the use of coffee cups for orange juice.

Alternative
Perhaps the way to send the message and to preclude the unintended spread of the stereotype – in this case that girl’s AREN’T good at math – perhaps it could be simply “Girls are good at math.”

Proposed (re)solution?
Better yet, instead of making a simple statement, we could give examples that defy the (alleged) stereotype thereby working to discredit it AND avoiding it’s perpetuation. It’s easy to argue with a statement (such as “Girls aren’t good at math.). If a brief profile of a woman who is an astronaut, an architect, an engineer, etc. is shared, it begins to dissolve the stereotype without spreading it.

]]>
By: Lina http://mathfour.com/general/everybodys-good-at-math#comment-2608 Sat, 01 Oct 2011 00:28:11 +0000 http://mathfour.com/?p=3787#comment-2608 I am the creator of the Twitter campaign #girlsaregoodatmath2. I think you should read my post about the conception of the campaign here, http://wp.me/p1P9xO-3G.

I understand @mathfour’s concerns that the way we say this message may imply that girls aren’t good in math, which is the opposite of the campaign’s purpose.

However, I would like to bring up a point that @mathfour and I discussed on Twitter today. We discussed what the best response to a negative stereotype or inappropriate behavior is. @mathfour thinks that we should just roll our eyes when someone behaves badly. I think that a campaign to help counterbalance stereotypes is the way to go. For example, NAACP helps educate and fight stereotypes against colored people. Shouldn’t we be able to create a campaign that helps fight stereotypes against girls in mathematics?

Remember, we may not always have the opportunity to roll our eyes because subtle, unconscious messages affect female students as well…

Check out the blog at linasouid.wordpress.com. Discuss this with me on Twitter @LinaSouid.

Hope to continue the friendly discussion with you, @mathfour. We want the same thing, but in different ways–which is fun!

I will add a poll on this soon. Come vote on the blog!

]]>